Thursday, January 07, 2010

Just A Reminder...Israel's Claim to Judea and Samaria

Evelyn Gordon puts it so succinctly.

Though there had long been a lively debate as to whether Israel ought to hold on to these territories in practice, until 1993 all sides were ready to assert that it had a valid claim to them in principle. The argument in favor of Israel’s right to sovereignty there was simple: these territories are the historic Jewish homeland, the heart of the biblical Jewish kingdom. They were explicitly allotted to the future Jewish state by the 1922 League of Nations Mandate, which was never legally superseded. Although the 1947 UN partition plan allotted part of the land to a putative Arab state—a plan that Palestinians and other Arabs rejected as a matter of principle—it was merely a nonbinding “recommendation” (as its own language stated). Thus once the Arabs rejected it, the measure had no more validity than any other unsigned deal. Nor did any sovereign state ever replace the Mandate on this territory: though Jordan and Egypt conquered the West Bank and Gaza, respectively, in 1948, neither conquest was ever internationally recognized. Legally, therefore, the territories remained stateless lands whose ownership is disputed; over time, the Palestinians simply replaced Egypt and Jordan as the Arab claimants.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

what has this got to do with the current perception in the arab world? it is this perception we are up against. do you think informing them of true history will make them say, 'oh, we made a mistake. our bad. you really deserve what we formerly referred to as the occupied territories/palestine.'? again, preaching to the choir.
from the perspective of jewish tradition, the regular pilgrimmages to qever rachel should give one pause. do you really believe that history trumps memory [however contrived, recently formed, or trumped-up]?

Jeffrey Woolf said...

You have to read more closely. We need to teach ourselves (and maybe we can find an unprejudiced ear out there). The Arabs and the Christian Left, understandably, don't care.

Anonymous said...

if you think that these history lessons are meant to effect change among jews and the unprejudiced but not among arabs, then in your prior post you would not have said 'A History Lesson for MK Dr. Zahalka'
and
Read 'em and weep Zahalka.